Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Premnath Narayanan's avatar

Looking forward for the book. I have all your books. This is exiting.

Suman Suhag's avatar

You're getting into zen-existential "if a tree falls in the forest..." territory here and there is only one right answer, regardless of how adamantly someone may deliver another answer, how many votes it gets or how many letters follow the answerer's name.

The question boils down to whether the physical (including "quantum") world exists outside a person's perception of it. Since not one person alive truly understands the nature of consciousness, human existence, human perception or death (or even the complete nature of "quanta"), the right answer at this time is "I don't know." Any other answer is a hypothesis, not a fact.

Hypotheses (guesses) are fine - they keep a discussion going, and fuel more experiments to search for indisputable truth. But, far too often, scientists parlay non-facts as fact, usually to push an agenda. When they do they are no better than the religionists they often scoff at for pushing faith as fact. In both camps "I don't know" needs to be said more often, eliminating hubris, posturing and agendas, and demonstrating the rare quality of honesty.

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?